Bits, Pieces, and More On The Graham/McCain Issue

June 10th, 2008

Friends,

Take a look at “Joe American” and what he offers as guidance to McCain and Obama.

http://www.youtube.com:80/watch?v=ZPch2k63uj4

It would also seem appropriate that Chuck Baldwin, Constitution Party nominee for president http://www.constitutionparty.com/ and Bob Barr, Libertarian Party http://www.lp.org/ nominee for president also pay attention.

Remember, there are other options beyond Obama and McCain.

Several took issue with me over the “Rev Billy Graham Rebuffed by Senator McCain”. Register and offer comments. Let everyone know how you feel.

As a follow-on, some additional thoughts on the subject of the McCain staff report rebuffing Rev Graham.

There are three stories out there……one, the McCain campaign did reject meeting with Rev Billy Graham as Director of Scheduling Amber Johnson said; and two, now the McCain campaign, as reported on Fox News, say there has been on-going dialogue with the Graham organization to schedule a meeting.

A third and new report http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/graham_mccain_wead/2008/06/09/103116.html?s=al&promo_code=6405-1 which quotes Franklin Graham tends to reflect a less than accurate status to both the original Jacobs request and the McCain organizations contention that active dialogue with Graham contacts in setting up a meeting is on-going.

The initial reports seem to have shades of truth, for sure the rejection by Amber Johnson is correct and documented.

Is it possible the Scheduling Director for McCain’s organization knew nothing about on-going talks with the Graham organization? It would seem she would be in the “first to know” category. If there was active talk don’t you think she would have implied or perhaps explicitly indicated some consideration was already on-going in her reply?

Or, is there double motive here? One, Amber Johnson knew what was going on but was directed to send a message for the ears and eyes of those that want McCain to stay clear of religion and conservatives. Is there any doubt politicians will play both sides…that they have zero integrity? On the other hand, McCain’s campaign also sending a message that McCain is working to meet with Rev Graham…soothing the conservative/Christian right……..

Both sides get some of what they want to hear……..the liberal/left get a note that indicates McCain is cool to Rev Graham and the conservatives/Christian groups get a message he is warm to Rev Graham….and the McCain campaign does what politicians do best…talk out of both sides of their mouth.

Finally, the third report indicates Jacobs was not authorized to approach the McCain organization nor does the McCain organization have any active contact with the Graham Association.

You decide…………

Harry Riley, COL, USA, Ret

Rev Billy Graham Rebuffed By Senator McCain?

June 9th, 2008

Friends,

What would motivate John McCain and/or his staff to rebuff a meeting with Rev Billy Graham?

You can read all about the issue at the links below, but for the life of me I can’t imagine any common sense, respectable answer to dismissing Rev Billy Graham short of pure, raw, political correctness. Seldom is Rev Graham referred to as “Dr Graham”…but in keeping with political correctness, anything of a religious nature is to be avoided.

Senator McCain meets with all kinds of people but few that compel the attention, stature, and high regard held by most Americans for Rev Graham.

In true political fashion, Senator McCain lauds the accomplishments of Hillary Clinton, a politician that supports a litany of positions conservatives reject as well as most Americans. McCain voices accolades for all the advancement, support, and success Senator Clinton has made for women? What has Senator Clinton done of a positive nature for women? Seems to me she supports issues that most American women reject - most American women support childbirth, not killing babies. Who can envision a woman allowing a living baby to exit the birth canal while a doctor is ready to kill it with the gruesome brain puncture called “partial birth abortion”? Is Hillary Clinton really a role model for most American women or is she simply a media experiment?

It appears Senator McCain views association with Rev Graham as a negative impact on his campaign but the so-called “female” vote that Senator Clinton is alleged to command is really what McCain is after. My personal opinion has always been that Senator McCain is not too be trusted, will extinguish “right” for a vote, and will crush anything or anyone, to include deity, that gets in the way of his personal ambitions…America is not his focus, it’s John McCain.

You can read the article by Doug Wead at the first link below. The second link is the actual letter from McCain headquarters to the Billy Graham initiative, although I have printed it below.

http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/mccain_graham_meeting/2008/06/08/102779.html?s=al&promo_code=63E9-1

http://w3.newsmax.com/mccain/
——————————————————————————–
June 3, 2008

Dear Mr. Jacobs,

Thank you for your kind letter offering to set up a personal meeting between Senator McCain and Dr. Billy Graham.

Senator McCain appreciates your invitation and the valuable opportunity it represents.

Unfortunately, I must pass along our regrets and do not foresee an opportunity to add this event to the calendar.

I know you will understand that with the tremendous demands on his time and the large volume of similar requests, events such as this are extremely difficult to schedule even though each one is important. However, we will keep your event in mind should an opportunity present itself in the future.

I know that the Senator would want me to thank you for your interest and to send his very best wishes.

Sincerely,

Amber Johnson

Director of Scheduling

John McCain 2008
——————————————————————————–
My prayer remains that God will deliver America by lifting a respectable conservative presidential candidate to lead our nation. Pray for Divine intervention.

Harry Riley, COL, USA, Ret

http://www.usawakeup.org/

Now Hear This, Now Hear This, American Conservatives Speaking

June 6th, 2008

TO: John McCain and the RNC,

Your latest solicitation for our money has a lot of “I want…” statements in it. Merely saying “I want…” does NOT impress me and won’t get the job done!

I would like to hear some “I WILL…” AND MEAN IT !

If you want our money, and our vote, then “WE WANT” some ACTION from the RNC and John McCain!

GET YOU HEAD OUT AND PAY ATTENTION…. WE ARE SERIOUS AMERICAN CITIZENS THAT VOTE!

We WANT an absolute, unequivocal, commitment that we WILL DRILL HERE, DRILL NOW, AND PAY LESS! The stupidity of sitting on trillions of cubic feet of our own natural gas and billions of barrels of our own oil while begging Arabs for more is beyond insanity! We want refineries, clean safe nuclear power, and STOP BURNING OUR FOOD FOR FUEL!

We WANT an absolute, unequivocal, commitment that the borders WILL be closed and NO illegals will get ANY amnesty or special consideration ahead of those waiting to enter legally!

We WANT an absolute, unequivocal, commitment that employers of illegals will be prosecuted. The illegals will go home on their own… and real wages for real Americans will rise!

We WANT an absolute, unequivocal, commitment that federal funding will be withdrawn from “sanctuary cities”…. immediately! I obey the federal laws… so should city officials… or defund and prosecute them.

We WANT an absolute, unequivocal, commitment that ONLY strict constructionist federal and Supreme Court judges will be nominated, AND that they will be supported, in hearings! Abiding by our Constitution has worked to get us here… it will work for our future!

We WANT an absolute, unequivocal, commitment that NO new taxes bills will be signed!

We WANT an absolute, unequivocal, commitment that there will be NO carbon tax schemes and NO so called “global warming” or “climate change” agreements catering to the fear mongers claiming “man-made” climate change. The world climate has ALWAYS changed and puny mankind cannot control it! The facts, evidence, and tens of thousands of scientists, say it is a pure hoax, a lie, and a grab for money and power and it MUST be stopped before it destroys our economy!

We WANT an absolute, unequivocal, commitment that ALL earmarks will be vetoed!

We WANT an absolute, unequivocal, commitment that Social Security will be reformed and made solvent to end the illegal Ponzi scheme that will devastate the retirement of so many!

We WANT an absolute, unequivocal, commitment to oppose all forms of abortion, oppose same sex marriage, oppose civil unions of same sex couples, and support marriage as a union between one man and one woman.

We WANT an absolute, unequivocal, commitment to retain “under God” in our pledge of allegiance, our coins to retain “in God we trust”, and English declared the official single language of the United States.

We WANT an absolute, unequivocal, commitment that if United States security is threatened, before American military forces are committed, Congress will issue a “declaration of war”.

Newt is offering you a “Platform For America”! READ IT!

http://www.americansolutions.com/actioncenter/petitions/?Guid=bf4a5257-45e3-4a94-97fc-57e2d7ecb6f9

It is a comprehensive list of what the overwhelming majority of “Americans” have said we want! If you are smart, you will use it in a Republican Platform! It is a winner for you politicians and for we American citizens!

Also check out http://buchanan.org:80/blog/2008/06/pjb-bush’s-black-list/

When John McCain, and the RNC, make these strong commitments, we will again support Republicans with OUR money and our vote!

But, NOT UNTIL THEN… IT IS TOO IMPORTANT!!!

DO YOU HEAR US…. OR ARE YOU NOW DEAF TO REAL AMERICAN VALUES?

WWII Warriors - America Without Them?

June 6th, 2008

“I mean what I say”?

 

Our leaders have waxed eloquent in the past and probably will again as they describe the dedication, patriotism, impact on liberty, relative to the victory over Japan and Germany, reflecting what our WWII warriors accomplished in commemorating D-Day, 1944.

Sadly, the dichotomy of words and reality is stark….remember President Bush’s words in a pre-inaugural address on 19 January, 2001  when he said “In order to make sure that morale is high with those who wear the uniform today, we must keep our commitment to those who wore the uniform in the past…”. We will make sure promises made to our veterans will be promises kept.”  and in a news conference April 13, 2004, he stated “I mean what I say”?

Given that earned medical care benefits due WWII military retirees have been denied;  other warrior, family, and widow compensation is recognized somewhere behind benefits for “illegal aliens;  one can only conclude political statements we hear from the President and members of Congress is little more than hot air. Even the courts have recognized the medical care obligation America has to it’s WWII troops.

It is absolutely mind boggling that the leadership of America can, with a straight face, use the magnificent success of our WWII victories, and our military force success in general, to score political points or advance some political agenda, while willingly ignoring or worse, denying earned compensation and benefits to the service members that secured the liberty we enjoy.

To make matters worse, elements in Department of Defense routinely attack earned benefits as a “drain on national security”, create crafty diversions to delay or deny veteran compensation, attach “pork” to essential legislation as personal, to name a few examples.  Congress throws a bone once in a while but in general schemes to cap military compensation while exempting other federal categories; in short, it appears military compensation and benefits are near the first to suffer when a funding crunch exists…the question is how can such devious behavior be tolerated by America?

The answer:  Most politicians and most Americans for that matter, do not understand warrior, family and widow sacrifices…why?  They have never served and take freedom for granted. America has lost it’s will, it’s rudder, and the storm is increasing.

The government that commits to it’s warriors in battle and other crisis then reneges when the smoke clears and the floods recede, is in jeopardy as a nation.  
 
Harry Riley, COL, USA, Ret

www.eaglesup.us “Where there is no offense, there is no effect.”
 
Isaiah 40:31 - But they that wait upon the LORD shall renew their strength; they shall mount up with wings as eagles; they shall run, and not be weary; and they shall walk, and not faint.
 
Take a few minutes, watch  http://www.usawakeup.org/  and  http://talon.eaglesup.us/ 

Is There Greater Love On The Earth?

May 23rd, 2008

Remember Our Fallen

 

 

 

No Greater Love Has Any Man Than To Lay Down His Life For A Brother

 

 

Brokered Republican Convention - McCain Must Go

May 17th, 2008

Is A Brokered Republican Convention Inevitable?

Friends,

I want to say right off, I won’t be taking “personal” pot shots at any political party, individual, race, creed, or gender, in expressing my thoughts. With this said, you wonder what rant is coming now? Right?

Well, after reading what I propose, read what Tom Segel says in his latest contribution below…I agree completely with what Tom says, and in a nut shell, he makes the point that the problems America is facing today is the fault of you and me.

To be up front, I oppose the current Democratic party leadership principles almost completely…in fact I can’t think of a single principle Democrat candidates for President are suggesting that I can support. It’s almost the same situation with the Republican candidate for President…too soft on major issues, a liberal tilt, and too close to those that support the Democratic principles I reject.

Tom Segel makes the point we, the American people, must change our ways and “next time do it right” when we elect political leaders. Well folks, “the next time” is coming up in November and if we don’t do it right it could cost us eight years of disaster, or worse. Your question, “what can we do? The die is cast…we have to live with the republican candidate and one of the democratic candidates for president.” Wrong for me!

For folks that believe the Clinton/Obama option is the right choice, then go for it. Neither Obama, Clinton, or McCain is right for me and I believe they’re not right for millions of other Americans. What is occurring reflects the “lesser evil” attitude as the only option. There is another option.

Now you say, as so many of you have said to me before on other issues, “what do we do?”.

Not long ago the United States Congress tried to force totally unacceptable illegal immigration legislation down the throats of the American people. This was met with an outcry of opposition from every segment of America with an anger, disgust, and rejection that rocked the legislators on their heels and in retreat. America rose up, spoke loud, clear and demanded a closed border, prosecution of lawless employers, and no amnesty or special privileges for those that break the law. (The Republican presidential candidate seems to be the only one that still doesn’t get it).We must once again come together with that same determination and resolve to do it right regarding presidential selection…the impact is potentially disastrous for America if we fail.

Question: Where do you fit in the Zogby poll below? Are you unhappy with your presidential choices? Are you willing to cast a presidential vote for someone you don”t support? Are you part of the “unhappy” group in this Zogby poll recently released?
——————————————————————————–
ZOGBY PRESS RELEASE:

“UTICA, New York - Nearly half of likely voters - 48% - are not satisfied with the current candidates for president, with Republicans and conservative voters the most unhappy about their likely candidate choices in November, a new nationwide Zogby Interactive poll shows.

In what could spell bad news for the presumptive Republican nominee John McCain, an overwhelming 86% of self-described “very conservative” voters said they are displeased with the current presidential candidates - and 65% of these voters said they are very unsatisfied. The vast majority of conservatives (76%) and Republicans (76%) also expressed significant dissatisfaction with the current candidates, as did more than half of political independents (55%).

How satisfied are you with the current candidates for president?

——————–Satisfied——–Not Satisfied——Not sure
Likely voters———-51%—————48%—————-1%
Republicans———–24%—————76%—————-<1%
Democrats————-82—————-18%—————–1%
Independents———44%—————55%—————-1%

Note: Some totals may not equal 100% due to rounding. End of poll data.
——————————————————————————–
Now, let’s draw back on what happened with the Illegal Alien Amnesty Bill and apply that outrage and impact on the president candidate question.

Based on the Zogby presentation 76% of Republicans and 55% of Independents are not satisfied with the presidential options…a huge population of America do not want what appears to be a “forced feeding” of unpalatable candidates. What will this large number of dissatisfied Americans do? Accept it or say “hell no” just as we said “hell no” to the unacceptable Illegal Immigration Amnesty Legislation? Will we continue to roll over and allow the political apparatus to “force feed” us or will we rise up make a statement, and reject political slavery?

Here’s what we can do…I’m only speaking about the Republican nominee but any American, regardless of party that is unhappy with the republican presidential choice should support what is suggested below.

Start a movement across America demanding the Republican Presidential Convention reopen the nomination process…a brokered convention if you will that will seek Godly guidance in discussing, analyzing, evaluating, and voting to accept additional presidential nominations from the floor, before considering Senator McCain as the presidential nominee. The goal should be to nominate a republican presidential candidate with conservative credentials consistent with a Reagan vision for America to become President of the United States.

Please don’t sigh and say “we can’t do that”. We can and must do this. The political apparatus is not the decision makers…we are, the voters. What the delegates do at the convention is not their will, but the will of the America people. Only a small percentage of America, a few million have said McCain is the choice…the other 250 million have not spoken. It will only take a few million of us to out number the primary votes McCain received and convince the republican apparatus a new candidate is demanded. If we want it to happen and speak loudly enough, McCain will go and a conservative will carry the republican banner in November 2008…and win the Presidency.

Tom Segel gives the details of past inaction on the part of American voters…read what he says. Do we want more of the same?

If we don’t want more of the same then all across America letters to editors, faxes to politicians, demanding convention delegates conduct a re-look, expressing the “brokered convention” idea on radio talk shows, bombarding all media with the idea, saturate the blogosphere, inundating Republican Convention delegates that McCain is unacceptable, stop sending campaign contributions to McCain and other quasi-conservatives, bombard the Republican National Committee with demands for a conservative republican nominee…all this and more. A repeat of the attitude that defeated Illegal Alien Amnesty Legislation will restore a conservative republican presidential candidate to face the democrat nominee.

Republicans need to accept the fact that with McCain as the republican nominee, there will be a democrat president elected in November, 2008. A brokered Republican Convention is the only solution.

Harry Riley, COL, USA, Ret

Thomas D. Segel
Tom@thomasdsegel.com
www.thomasdsegel.com
956 423 3126

Oil Too Expensive? You And I Are To Blame!

750 words

Harlingen, Texas, May 16, 2008: Well, my last fill-up of gas only took $60 out of my wallet. And, I still had about four gallons in the tank when I turned on the pump. It made me very angry and I made my feelings known to a lot of people. Roaring about the high price of gasoline and oil seems to be the only topic of conversation these days. You hear it at work, at home, after church and in the barbershop. It leads the nightly news, makes headlines in daily newspapers and is expressed in fearful ways by school officials, business owners and those who rely on the fuel to power their farm implements and heavy machinery.

Right now everyone is blaming the politicians for this major attack on family, city, state and national budgets. It is right to point the finger at Washington. Those who cast votes in Congress are the major culprits in this energy war. But, right next to them stand the American voters who placed these politicos in positions of power.

At the top of the list in this “blame game” are those who have insisted on voting the Democratic ticket regardless of reason or logic. What they have earned is the consequences of pandering to the liberal left. We knew we were in trouble back in 1973 with rationing, gas lines and about 30%of our oil requirements being filled by imports. Now, 35 years later we have still done nothing to improve our energy supply and our national need for imported oil has grown to more than twice the 1973 requirement.

Republicans had a chance to correct the problem back in the early 90s. They gained control of Congress in 1994 with promises made in their “Contract with America”. Then, instead of staying on mission and growing their majority, the GOP managed to give us the dalliances of Newt Gingrich, followed by the scandals involving party leaders such as Tom DeLay, Duke Cunningham, Mark Foley and Bob Ney to name a few. Added to that, a complete departure from conservative values, pork barrel spending and a mismanaged war totaled up to a stinging defeat at the ballot box and a return to Republican minority status.

If you traditionally voted the GOP ticket, you can blame yourself for failing to place quality individuals in office. Those elected managed to misuse the public trust, lost to the opposing party and ended any chance we had to move toward energy independence.

Those of you, who cast your lot with the Party of Thomas Jefferson, also deserve a major portion of the “blame pie”. Your emotion driven votes to empower obstructionists have kept us energy dependent. For more than thirty-five years Democrats have managed to torpedo any chance we had to keep our energy ship afloat. In vote after vote and bill after bill, those who lean far left of center have bent to the will of NIMBYs (Not In My Back Yard), environmentalists, animal rights advocates, and other socialist driven causes to stop any attempt at drilling in national waters, Alaskan locales and other known deposit sites. They have refused to listen when our President asked them to increase our energy development and even placed him in a position where he has been begging the leaders of other countries to feed our demand for in increased oil supply.

But, oil is not the only thing the American public has voted to restrict. Voters have kept us from increasing natural gas, wind driven energy and even solar power by allowing restrictive legislation. Voters have kept nuclear power at a standstill by placing into public office politicians who voted against power plant construction. Voters have allowed litigation to stop the construction of oil refineries and coal operated power plants. Voters have placed multiple barriers in place to stop the advancement of our abundant coal supply as an alternative energy source.

The usual response to such charges is “I didn’t vote for any of those things!” But, you did really do just that. In America’s representative republic, those we place in office are charged with voting the will of their constituents. Thus, you and I are the reason oil has started robbing our nation of a prosperous future. We are also the reason alternative forms of energy have not been developed.

How do you correct the problem? You do it by using those same ballots that got us in this mess…. But, next time do it right!

Semper Fidelis Tom Segel tomsegel@sbcglobal.net

FREEDOM OF SPEECH OR LAWLESS ACTION?

May 16th, 2008

War protesters: Freedom of speech or lawless action?

By: Luigi DeFrancesco

Is it really an exercise of freedom of speech or undermining a President, who happens to represent a political ideology opposite to the one they belong to, and placing our troops in harms way?

Is this act of “presumed” freedom of speech bring results of unintended (or intended) consequences in the battlefield?

The USA was involved in a War that, in accordance with the War power Act of 1973 was presented to congress. Congress passed a resolution approving the action against Afghanistan and Iraq. Both Democrats and Republicans voted for the resolution. Congress approval of the war resulted in the commitment of our troops. The performance of our soldiers has been so astonishing to make all Americans proud. Does a minute fraction of the USA population have the right under the freedom of speech clause to undermine our government action based on a decision made by Democrats and Republicans alike, to be involved in a War against terrorists?

Has the Supreme Court rendered an opinion on dissent in time of war? The following cases should give us some guidance. In Schenck v. United States judge Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. opinion, writing for a unanimous majority, ruled that it was illegal to distribute fliers opposing the draft during World War I. Holmes argued this abridgment of free speech was permissible because it presented a “clear and present danger” to the government’s recruitment efforts for the war.

In Brandenburg v. Ohio the United States Supreme Court held that the government couldn’t punish inflammatory speech unless it is directed to inciting and likely to incite imminent lawless action. In his concurrence of this decision judge William O. Douglas dealt with the classic example of a man “falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic.” In order to explain why someone could be legitimately prosecuted for this, Douglas called it an example in which “speech is brigaded with action.” In the view of Douglas and Black, this was probably the only sort of case in which a person could be prosecuted for speech.

How one would apply the two Supreme Court decisions to today “dissent” against the USA involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan?

With the Schenck v. United States case one could state the case that “the clear and present danger” to the population of the United States of America by the terrorists is real and devastating as the attack against the Twin Towers both in 1993 and in 2001 as shown. These two attacks on the same target show the persistent attempt to do the USA terrible harm therefore our government has the duty to stop the terrorists that are a “clear and present danger” any where in the world therefore based on this decision no USA citizen has the right to undermine our government effort to protect our lives and properties.

In the Brandenburg v. Ohio decision one could conclude that the “dissent” shown only against our governments is directed to incite imminent lawless action. Here is why: the war against Iraq has been over for a while. The free elected governments of Iraq and the USA are working to bring law and order in that land. The people that are taking armed action against the legitimate government of Iraq are lawless terrorists that believe that Iraq would be a better staging area against the interest of the people of the United States. Our troops and those of Iraq are placing their lives on the line in order to achieve their goal the same way United States troops tried and succeeded to do in Germany and Italy after the end World War II. Then the United States solved the insurgency problem quickly by executing insurgent on the spot where they were captured. The History channel showed a documentary on the German insurgency not long ago. The other factor that helped our troops was that no “dissent” was allowed during that period. After sixty-three years we still have troops in Germany and Italy.

How are dissenters inciting lawless action? Ho Chi Min the north Vietnam dictator stated it very plainly: without the mass demonstrations in the USA against the war in South Vietnam we would have never won the armed conflict against the USA Armed Forces. The Vietnam era dissenters incited a lawless action by North Vietnam when it broke the Peace Treaty of 1973 and invaded South Vietnam with catastrophic results in the region in human lives lost not only in South Vietnam but also in Cambodia.

The terrorists in Iraq and around the world are counting on the same “dissenters” to continue undermining the governments of Iraq and USA with the hope that they will force the USA to pull out of Iraq and then they would only have to face a weaker army similar to that of South Vietnam.

Each time the “dissenters” protest against our government the terrorist get bolder and more bombs explode against our troops.

Are these “dissenters” inciting imminent lawless action against our troops or are they exercising their freedom of speech? You be the judge!

Comments to: Luigi DeFrancesco
lsdefrank@yahoo.com

The argument most certainly will be, “America is not in a “declared war”.

Larry, Curly, and Moe Want To Be President

May 9th, 2008

Who would have believed…Larry, Curly and Moe as America’s major party presidential candidates.  I realize the comparison is an insult to the The Three Stooges for which I apologize.
 
America is surely desperate to elect someone without moral principle but heavy on the “relativism” platform.  What I hear from the LCM crowd tends to suggest they will fabricate moral standards, distort as they go, and apply whatever fits their scheme to be elected. (The sniper fire was intense, after 20 years I’ve learned about my Pastor, open border-closed border and illegal alien citizenship)  There’s nothing of substance in a single candidates message, only rhetoric…a constant politically correct promise of a “full plate of pork” for every American for a vote.
 
The two major parties decided they want no candidate with leadership and management experience, opting for LCM of which two support abortion, gay rights, same sex marriage, open borders, surrender to the enemy, more taxes, expanding government, to name a few.  The third is a mixture of the other two with questionable traits, experience, and position.
 
As some point America will become totally fed up with being forced “more of the same” by the dominant two party system and cast it off as so much incestuous, pathetic, systemic failure. 
 
As for me I’ll vote for a third party candidate, feel good about myself, and trust God for the best.  If my choice loses, there’s not a dimes worth of difference between the LCM winner.

 Harry Riley, COL, USA, Ret

Isaiah 40:31 - But they that wait upon the LORD shall renew their strength; they shall mount up with wings as eagles; they shall run, and not be weary; and they shall walk, and not faint.

Take a few minutes, watch  http://www.usawakeup.org/